Socialist Alternative

Seattle Tenants Clash with City Council

Published on

“A recent study showed that most Americans don’t have enough savings for even a $400 emergency.  How do you expect them to pay thousands just to move in?  The choice before you is simple – you either stand with renters, or stand with the landlord lobby.”

~ Ty Moore, a member of Socialist Alternative, in a public comment to the Seattle City Council

Socialist Alternative Councilmember Kshama Sawant has been the most vocal councilmember in the fight to address Seattle’s housing crisis. Her office helped escalate a tenant struggle against a slumlord into the Carl Haglund law earlier this year, which restricted landlords from raising rents on tenants whose apartments contain code violations. Black Lives Matter activists aided by Kshama’s office recently succeeded in blocking the construction of a $160 million police bunker in North Seattle and now Kshama is working to build a coalition determined to reappropriate those funds for the construction of 1,000 low-income homes this year. In addition, her office has been working on an ordinance to reduce the financial burden placed on tenants when moving into a new apartment by capping move-in fees and allowing a payment plan for rental deposits.

On Monday, October 17, roughly 50 protesters packed city hall to urge the Seattle City Council to vote  the move-in fees bill.   

Scores of individuals delivered public comment during the meeting, and many told stories of struggling to keep a roof over their families’ heads due to the burden high fees had placed on them.  One such individual, Michelle Dillon, gave the following statement:

“I moved into an apartment building where rent has been increased every single year.  I now pay 70 percent of my income in rent.  Why have I stayed? Because of move-in fees – with my rent and my income, it would take me nearly a year to save the $3,000 or more that it might take me to move into a new place, and that’s if I don’t buy groceries or take the bus at all in that year … we’re out here, we’re suffering, we need your help.”

Despite intense support for the bill among speakers , many of whom came bearing signs with such slogans as “Housing 4 People not 4 Profits” and “Move-in Costs are a Crime,” the council delayed the vote. And, Councilmember Sawant made clear who was pressuring the rest of the council to do so.

 Corporate Democrats Exposed False Excuses

The Multi-Family Housing Association, a group representing property management companies across the state of Washington sent councilmembers an email with explicit orders to delay the vote to allow them time to amend it. The majority of councilmembers, all self-proclaimed progressive Democrats, many of whom have received the maximum campaign contributions from the Multi-Family Housing Association, then plotted to send the bill back to committee. They claimed this was an attempt to perfect the bill and bring more stakeholders to weigh in, but the use of vague terms like “stakeholders” typically translates to big business and landlord interests.

Thanks to impassioned statements by Socialist Alternative members and other community members, the council was forced to agree to stick to the original implementation date of January 1st. Juarez was also forced into a defensive position over her support for her big business backers and tried to cover up saying: “I am committed to working with all stakeholders … I don’t want this to make this an ‘us vs. them’ issue”.

But of course a victory for tenants is IS an us vs. them issue! The demand for more affordable rent is a demand to reduce the profits of the big landlords and property developers. This is why we need movements to fight for our interests when big business already gets a seat at the table, and it’s why we need more representatives like Kshama Sawant who don’t take money from big business and corporate landlord interests, instead fighting 100% on the side of the 99%.

The Struggle Continues

While the actions of Monday’s protesters did not secure an immediate victory, they did succeed in preventing an indefinite delay of the bill, and helped to shield it from undue tampering by sending it back to a committee chaired by Kshama Sawant.  This means the struggle isn’t over. We can win if we continue building a fighting campaign to pressure the city council to pass the strongest legislation possible.

The spirits of the protesters also appeared undiminished as they rallied outside the council chambers after the vote.  Xochitl Maykovich, a WashingtonCAN organizer, asked the impassioned crowd,

“Are we going to be back here in November?”

A resounding chorus responded, “YES!”

Latest articles

MORE LIKE THIS

Baltimore Bridge Collapse Kills 6, Shipping Industry to Blame

On March 26, the Dali, a container ship leased by shipping giant Maersk headed for Sri Lanka, lost all power while still in the...

Border Deal Shows The Crisis Facing Both Democrats & Republicans

Congress has been in a gridlock for most of February over the border deal that almost was, highlighting just how incapable the bosses’ two...

The Two-Party System Is Killing Us – Can We Build An Alternative?

Statistically speaking, you’re not excited about the 2024 Presidential election. According to a new poll, 59% of registered voters have little or no enthusiasm about...

Hundreds Of Thousands Vote “Uncommitted” In Democratic Primaries

Joe Biden’s complicity in the murderous bombing and invasion of Gaza is costing him hundreds of thousands of votes in the primaries. Who is his...